Nicheloom

Market intelligence for builders — see what's gaining traction before it's crowded.

GrindLens

You solved it. But did you actually learn the pattern?

Details

External ID
1252491
Source
PH
Company
—
Product
GrindLens
Website domain
producthunt.com
Launched
Sept. 17, 2026
Cohort
—
Upvotes
2
Upvotes percentile
0.7405388069275176
Tags
Productivity, Education, Developer Tools
Fetched at
Sept. 18, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
Updated at
Sept. 18, 2026, 4:40 a.m.

Description

You can solve hundreds of LeetCode problems and still not know what you're actually good at. GrindLens looks at your solving history differently. It maps the problems you've solved to DSA patterns, shows where you've built real coverage and where you're still struggling, tracks your progress across popular sheets, and helps you figure out what to practice next. because eventually, “457 solved” stops telling you much.

Enrichment

Theme
interactive quiz and trivia games
Vertical
Education
Function
Analytics & BI
Audience
Developer
AI stance
AI feature
Project type
Commercial product
Normalized one-liner
coding interview pattern analysis for engineers
Manually corrected
False

Could you build this?

Yes GrindLens queries LeetCode's public GraphQL API, maps solved problem IDs against known DSA taxonomy lists (NeetCode/Blind 75), and renders an analytics dashboard.

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one — 12 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #3 of 13 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 282 days after the earliest competitor.

Other launches for this product

Same idea, different domain

A concrete adaptation of this idea for Legal

FactPattern

FactPattern ingests practice histories from bar prep question banks like AdaptiBar and UWorld to map an examinee's completed Multistate Bar Examination (MBE) questions against a rigorous taxonomy of underlying legal fact archetypes rather than just broad subject percentages. It reveals whether a student truly understands systemic triggers—such as the subtle interplay between race-notice recording acts and wild deeds—or is merely recognizing repeated surface facts, and surfaces the precise doctrinal gap to practice next.

Bar examinees routinely grind through 2,000+ multiple-choice questions tracking raw completion volume, yet existing bar prep providers only report crude topic scores (e.g., '62% in Torts') rather than diagnosing structural blind spots across recurring procedural and constitutional fact patterns.