I ported Tree-sitter to Go
Details
- External ID
- 47155597
- Source
- HN
- Company
- —
- Product
- I ported Tree-sitter to Go
- Website domain
- github.com
- Launched
- Feb. 25, 2026
- Cohort
- —
- Upvotes
- 222
- Upvotes percentile
- 0.9568733153638814
- Tags
- —
- Fetched at
- Sept. 7, 2026, 9:25 p.m.
- Updated at
- Sept. 7, 2026, 9:25 p.m.
Description
This started as a hard requirement for my TUI-based editor application, it ended up going in a few different directions.A suite of tools that help with semantic code entities: https://github.com/odvcencio/gts-suiteA next-gen version control system called Got: https://github.com/odvcencio/gotI think this has some pretty big potential! I think there's many classes of application (particularly legacy architecture) that can benefit from these kinds of analysis tooling. My next post will be about composing all these together, an exciting project I call GotHub. Thanks!
Enrichment
- Theme
- developer tools and programming utilities
- Vertical
- Horizontal
- Function
- Dev tools
- Audience
- Developer
- AI stance
- Not AI
- Project type
- Hobby / open-source project
- Normalized one-liner
- tree-sitter parser generator for go
- Manually corrected
- False
Could you build this?
No Porting Tree-sitter—a complex C incremental GLR parsing library with intricate memory management and dynamic state tracking—purely into Go requires deep compiler design and formal grammar parsing expertise.
What it would actually take: The implementation requires translating Tree-sitter's core C runtime into idiomatic Go while maintaining identical GLR (Generalized LR) parsing semantics, error recovery algorithms, and binary compatibility with generated parser tables. The stack involves low-level Go unsafe pointers, custom allocators or slices to manage syntax trees efficiently, and comprehensive fuzz testing against the original C test suites. This demands specialized expertise in compiler construction and parser runtime internals.
Discussion
20 comments analyzed.
Competitors mentioned: Gitea (syntax highlighting alternative), VSCode, vim (editor comparisons), got (GitHub package with similar name)
Concerns raised: Project may lack activity in 6 months, Misleading claims without disclosing test suite pass rate, Not a complete port of original project, Confusion with established competing projects, One-off projects abandoned after initial launch
Feature requests: Disclose tree-sitter test suite pass rate, Show AI prompts used for code generation, Use standard project layouts, Clarify single-sentence vs multi-page instruction requirements
Competitors
Other products that read as similar to this one — 92 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.
Attention rank: #8 of 93 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).
Launched 108 days after the earliest competitor.
- Noodles · hn · 2026-02-24 · 6 upvotes · similarity 0.47
- PNANA · hn · 2026-01-28 · 11 upvotes · similarity 0.42
- difi · hn · 2026-02-03 · 46 upvotes · similarity 0.41
- SubjectiveZero, an open-source agentic node editor for creative coding · hn · 2026-07-10 · 25 upvotes · similarity 0.40
- axil · hn · 2026-03-30 · 5 upvotes · similarity 0.40
- Ane, a new chord-based terminal code editor with one-shot CLI edits · hn · 2026-05-15 · 5 upvotes · similarity 0.39
- Twigg · hn · 2026-07-24 · 17 upvotes · similarity 0.39
- Go-TUI · hn · 2026-03-06 · 7 upvotes · similarity 0.39
Other launches for this product
- No other launches for this product.
Same idea, different domain
Nobody's really built a dev tools tool for Sales yet.