Nicheloom visits: 58,031 all-time · 7,694 in the last 7 days

The opportunity tracker for new startups.

Today: 1,953 launches · Niche of the day: specialized calculation tools · See what launched today →

misa77

a codec that decodes 2x faster than LZ4 (at better ratios)

Get picks like this daily. Today's launch numbers, the top launches, AI and tech news, and a daily opportunity pick, straight to your inbox.

Want to reach these readers? Sponsor an issue.

I've spent the last few months working on this codec.It has the following characteristics: - SOTA decompression throughput in its ratio class - Decent ratios (comparable to LZ4 at high effort levels) - Slow compression Most of the gains can be attributed to reducing branches and making decompression very friendly to out-of-order cores, by using a smart format.Results on the tarred Silesia corpus on Intel x86-64 follow: codec decode ratio encode misa77 -0 5219 MB/s 42.64% 54.5 MB/s misa77 -1 4274 MB/s 39.65% 51.2 MB/s lz4 2505 MB/s 47.59% 371 MB/s lz4hc -12 2531 MB/s 36.45% 7.31 MB/s

HN · launched Jul 15, 2026 · 164 upvotes (top 5%) · 0 views

Niche: file and data compression tools · 100 launches, 15 in the last 7 days ▲ +88% · Explore this niche →

Category and tags

  • Horizontal
  • Data infrastructure
  • Developer
  • Not AI
  • Hobby / open-source project

Visit website ↗ Source listing ↗

Could you build this?

No Creating a lossless data compression codec that outperforms LZ4 requires deep expertise in low-level CPU architecture, instruction-level parallelism, branchless programming, and information theory.

What it would actually take: Building this requires expert knowledge of C/Rust, x86/ARM assembly, SIMD vectorization, and CPU cache hierarchies. The engineering involves designing custom bitstream token formats, prefix coding, and branchless byte-copy loops that saturate memory bandwidth while maintaining optimal compression ratios.

Discussion

20 comments analyzed.

Competitors mentioned: Zstd, Selkie, LZ4, LZO1X, Oodle

Concerns raised: Compression speed needs vast improvement, lacks arch-specific implementations, Compressed stream format may continue to change, affecting stability, Cannot be used for untrusted inputs without safety guarantees, Prevents streaming due to separate stream design

Feature requests: Add arch-specific optimizations for compression performance, Support in Parquet format, Improved compression ratio option for Snappy-like use cases

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one : 81 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #2 of 82 (itself plus its competitors, highest first, normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 256 days after the earliest competitor.

The niche, labels, vibe code rating and competitor comparison on this page are analysis by Nicheloom. If you use them, please credit nicheloom.com. How you may use our data.