Nicheloom

Market intelligence for builders — see what's gaining traction before it's crowded.

misa77

a codec that decodes 2x faster than LZ4 (at better ratios)

Details

External ID
48922838
Source
HN
Company
—
Product
misa77
Website domain
github.com
Launched
July 15, 2026
Cohort
—
Upvotes
164
Upvotes percentile
0.954599761051374
Tags
—
Fetched at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
Updated at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.

Description

I've spent the last few months working on this codec.It has the following characteristics: - SOTA decompression throughput in its ratio class - Decent ratios (comparable to LZ4 at high effort levels) - Slow compression Most of the gains can be attributed to reducing branches and making decompression very friendly to out-of-order cores, by using a smart format.Results on the tarred Silesia corpus on Intel x86-64 follow: codec decode ratio encode misa77 -0 5219 MB/s 42.64% 54.5 MB/s misa77 -1 4274 MB/s 39.65% 51.2 MB/s lz4 2505 MB/s 47.59% 371 MB/s lz4hc -12 2531 MB/s 36.45% 7.31 MB/s

Enrichment

Theme
lightweight and on-device AI runtimes
Vertical
Horizontal
Function
Data infrastructure
Audience
Developer
AI stance
Not AI
Project type
Hobby / open-source project
Normalized one-liner
fast compression codec
Manually corrected
False

Could you build this?

No Creating a lossless data compression codec that outperforms LZ4 requires deep expertise in low-level CPU architecture, instruction-level parallelism, branchless programming, and information theory.

What it would actually take: Building this requires expert knowledge of C/Rust, x86/ARM assembly, SIMD vectorization, and CPU cache hierarchies. The engineering involves designing custom bitstream token formats, prefix coding, and branchless byte-copy loops that saturate memory bandwidth while maintaining optimal compression ratios.

Discussion

20 comments analyzed.

Competitors mentioned: Zstd, Selkie, LZ4, LZO1X, Oodle

Concerns raised: Compression speed needs vast improvement, lacks arch-specific implementations, Compressed stream format may continue to change, affecting stability, Cannot be used for untrusted inputs without safety guarantees, Prevents streaming due to separate stream design

Feature requests: Add arch-specific optimizations for compression performance, Support in Parquet format, Improved compression ratio option for Snappy-like use cases

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one — 42 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #3 of 43 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 256 days after the earliest competitor.

Other launches for this product

Same idea, different domain

Nobody's really built a data infrastructure tool for Media & entertainment yet.