Nicheloom visits: 58,069 all-time · 7,637 in the last 7 days

The opportunity tracker for new startups.

Today: 1,953 launches · Niche of the day: specialized calculation tools · See what launched today →

A decent text-to-image model trained for ~$20K (Apache 2.0 Weights)

Get picks like this daily. Today's launch numbers, the top launches, AI and tech news, and a daily opportunity pick, straight to your inbox.

Want to reach these readers? Sponsor an issue.

My brother and I run a 2-person lab that trains our own generative video models from scratch. The ultimate goal is a set of creative tools that make it easier for anyone to make animation.Video models today are too slow/expensive and lack sufficient controls. Creativity is an iterative process. You make, you tweak, you get better. In our opinion, they're not usable yet for storytelling.When we set out to build Linum v3 (our next video model) earlier this year, the primary goal was to bring the cost envelope of inference down significantly. If our model is fast and cheap, it's the first step (of many) towards useful creative tools.Typically, you see "latent diffusion models". A VAE (Variational Autoencoder) compresses the input data into a smaller "latent space" and the diffusion model learns how to generate within this subspace.Over the past few months, we've been publishing our work on efficient pixel-space diffusion models. These throw away the VAE, having the diffusion model learn a latent-space optimized for its exact task.This serves 3 purposes: 1) Simplify Architecture (no 2-stage model training) 2) Faster Convergence (11x faster convergence vs. our latent diffusion counterpart) 3) Cheaper Inference (4x more aggressive token reduction in attention context-windows, without significant loss in quality)This past month we were pressure testing our latest architecture (Pyramid-JiT) by training a text-to-image model longer than the typical one-off experiment. Specifically, we trained it for ~$20K on 660M samples.We were surprised by the quality of results, so we thought we'd release it as open weights for the community (Apache 2.0). The research itself is already public, on our website.For us, it's a big stepping stone towards cheaper video models, since pretty much all video models start as image models. We like to say these models have to learn nouns before they learn verbs.

HN · launched Nov 4, 2026 · 284 upvotes (top 4%) · 0 views

Niche: ai image generators · 216 launches, 22 in the last 7 days ▼ -15% · Explore this niche →

Category and tags

  • Horizontal
  • Content generation
  • Developer
  • AI-native
  • Hobby / open-source project

Visit website ↗ Source listing ↗

Could you build this?

No Training a competitive generative model from scratch needs research-level architecture work, large GPU budgets and curated training data. Vibe coding cannot substitute for that.

What it would actually take: Reproducing this requires a novel pixel-space diffusion architecture (the Pyramid-JiT approach), a large curated image-text dataset, and a multi-GPU training setup costing around $20K or more. It also needs ML research expertise to tune convergence and evaluate quality. The released code and weights help, but a comparable model still demands research skills and compute.

Discussion

4 comments analyzed.

Concerns raised: over-smoothed output with uncanny shine, mangled limbs and typical t2i artifacts, unclear training dataset composition

Feature requests: INT4 quantized version, run in browser via WebGPU, swap in smaller text encoder such as T5-small or CLIP

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one : 955 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #57 of 956 (itself plus its competitors, highest first, normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 371 days after the earliest competitor.

The niche, labels, vibe code rating and competitor comparison on this page are analysis by Nicheloom. If you use them, please credit nicheloom.com. How you may use our data.