Nicheloom

Market intelligence for builders — see what's gaining traction before it's crowded.

Omni

Local-first multimodal file search on macOS

Details

External ID
48419626
Source
HN
Company
—
Product
Omni
Website domain
hanxiao.io
Launched
June 5, 2026
Cohort
—
Upvotes
6
Upvotes percentile
0.31420765027322406
Tags
—
Fetched at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
Updated at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.

Description

Finally made something I've always wanted, using the model we built.• SOTA omni embedding model, fully local, indexes text, PDF, image, audio, and video • Swift-native app UI + mlx-swift-transformer core. No Python. • Tested on M3 Pro 18G / M3 Ultra 512G / M4 Pro 48G. All work fine. • HTTP server exposes search to local agents like OpenClaw & Hermes − Indexing still feels slow even on the latest M3 Ultra, ranging from 10K tps to 300 tps depending on file type − Fans go crazy, high power draw while indexing − Search is near-instant. Multimodal relevance is sometimes arguable, but the idea is recall (the agentic LLM takes the results and refines for the final answer), so maybe that's fine

Enrichment

Theme
lightweight and on-device AI runtimes
Vertical
Horizontal
Function
Search & retrieval
Audience
B2C
AI stance
Not AI
Project type
Commercial product
Normalized one-liner
local file search for macos
Manually corrected
False

Could you build this?

Partial A developer can vibe-code the macOS Swift UI and local search orchestration, but developing a state-of-the-art unified multimodal embedding model from scratch requires deep ML research and training clusters.

What it would actually take: The production app uses Apple's MLX Swift runtime to execute matrix multiplications directly on Apple Silicon GPUs for local vector search. While the UI and SQLite/vector store indexing pipeline can be vibe-coded, the hard piece is the custom multimodal embedding model (spanning text, audio, image, and video in a single joint vector space), which requires large-scale contrastive pre-training across massive paired datasets using GPU compute clusters.

Discussion

2 comments analyzed.

Concerns raised: indexing performance is slow

Feature requests: run indexing as lower priority background task

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one — 52 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #35 of 53 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 185 days after the earliest competitor.

Other launches for this product