VisiSign
$0.10 per envelope e-signatures with no monthly fee
Details
- External ID
- 48154654
- Source
- HN
- Company
- —
- Product
- VisiSign
- Website domain
- visisign.app
- Launched
- May 15, 2026
- Cohort
- —
- Upvotes
- 7
- Upvotes percentile
- 0.4168012924071082
- Tags
- —
- Fetched at
- Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
- Updated at
- Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
Description
Most e-signature platforms charge: per seat, per envelope, API access fees, enterprise contractsWe built VisiSign with a different pricing model: $0.10 per envelope via API, no monthly minimum, no contracts, no seat pricingOr $49/month for the hosted team platform: unlimited users, unlimited sends, API includedThe reason this pricing works is simple:E-signatures are infrastructure now.Twilio doesn’t charge per employee. Stripe doesn’t charge per seat. Cloudflare doesn’t charge by company size.But most e-signature platforms are still priced like 2000s enterprise SaaS.It should work more like payments or email infrastructure: API-first, automation-friendly, embedded into workflows, usage-based when appropriateReal signature infrastructure is more than rendering a PDF: audit trails, timestamps, signer event history, tamper evidence, completion certificates, webhook workflowsSo we built VisiSign around that assumption.https://visisign.app
Enrichment
- Theme
- automated legal and compliance tools
- Vertical
- Legal
- Function
- Vertical SaaS
- Audience
- B2B
- AI stance
- Not AI
- Project type
- Commercial product
- Normalized one-liner
- e-signatures with per-envelope pricing
- Manually corrected
- False
Could you build this?
Partial The UI and PDF coordination are simple CRUD, but creating legally compliant, tamper-evident cryptographic audit trails adhering to ESIGN/eIDAS standards requires strict compliance and cryptographic workflows.
What it would actually take: The product needs a robust PDF manipulation engine (using PDFBox, MuPDF, or PyMuPDF) combined with PKI infrastructure for X.509 digital certificate signing and RFC 3161-compliant trusted timestamping. The challenging components are creating tamper-evident cryptographic hash chains for the audit log, maintaining legal enforceability across jurisdictions, and reliably extracting/positioning signatures across arbitrary PDF geometries. Builders need expertise in applied cryptography, PDF internals, and legal compliance frameworks.
Discussion
1 comment analyzed.
Competitors mentioned: Sekorti
Concerns raised: Pricing model for third-party app integration unclear, Legal compliance for signatures as valid authority uncertain
Competitors
Other products that read as similar to this one — 180 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.
Attention rank: #97 of 181 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).
Launched 182 days after the earliest competitor.
- Firma.dev · ph · 2026-06-12 · 324 upvotes · similarity 0.64
- DollarSign.io · ph · 2026-09-19 · 2 upvotes · similarity 0.63
- Sign · ph · 2026-09-08 · 2 upvotes · similarity 0.60
- QuickSnip · ph · 2026-09-24 · 2 upvotes · similarity 0.44
- We built a permissions layer for Notion · hn · 2026-01-08 · 12 upvotes · similarity 0.43
- Faivelo · ph · 2026-09-26 · 1 upvotes · similarity 0.43
- Professional email for $1/month · ph · 2026-09-24 · 2 upvotes · similarity 0.42
- Building a WhatsApp API with 0 markup on Meta pricing · hn · 2026-03-25 · 7 upvotes · similarity 0.42
Other launches for this product
- No other launches for this product.
Same idea, different domain
Nobody's really built a vertical saas tool for Insurance yet.