Nicheloom visits: 58,094 all-time · 7,637 in the last 7 days

The opportunity tracker for new startups.

Today: 1,953 launches · Niche of the day: specialized calculation tools · See what launched today →

sllm

Split a GPU node with other developers, unlimited tokens

Get picks like this daily. Today's launch numbers, the top launches, AI and tech news, and a daily opportunity pick, straight to your inbox.

Want to reach these readers? Sponsor an issue.

Running DeepSeek V3 (685B) requires 8×H100 GPUs which is about $14k/month. Most developers only need 15-25 tok/s. sllm lets you join a cohort of developers sharing a dedicated node. You reserve a spot with your card, and nobody is charged until the cohort fills. Prices start at $5/mo for smaller models.The LLMs are completely private (we don't log any traffic).The API is OpenAI-compatible (we run vLLM), so you just swap the base URL. Currently offering a few models.

HN · launched Apr 4, 2026 · 188 upvotes (top 4%) · 0 views

Niche: gpu infrastructure and developer tools · 129 launches, 7 in the last 7 days ▼ -30% · Explore this niche →

Category and tags

  • Horizontal
  • Model & infra
  • Developer
  • AI-native
  • Commercial product

Visit website ↗ Source listing ↗

Could you build this?

No Operating shared multi-tenant 8xH100 clusters with fair scheduling, custom GPU slicing, secure memory isolation, and high-throughput inference for 685B parameter models requires massive capital and specialized systems/GPU infra engineering.

What it would actually take: Building this requires a fleet orchestration layer on bare-metal GPU clusters (8xH100 NVLink nodes) using custom inference serving frameworks (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM) modified for fair-share token throttling and multi-tenant batch scheduling. It also needs a low-latency proxy layer with distributed billing/locking (Stripe integration, Redis locks) and secure execution isolation to prevent noisy-neighbor memory exhaustion, requiring expert GPU cluster and systems engineers.

Discussion

20 comments analyzed.

Competitors mentioned: OpenRouter, Chutes, Novita, hotaisle.xyz

Concerns raised: Product shutting down, Support email bouncing/unresponsive, Difficult to unsubscribe or close account, Earlier cohorts being canceled, Less flexible than competitors (can't switch models per-request)

Feature requests: 1-week or 1-day trial option before monthly commitment, Support for additional models beyond Qwen (MiMo-V2-Pro, Trinity), Ability to switch between models per-request, Stronger TEE guarantees if threat model requires it

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one : 369 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #21 of 370 (itself plus its competitors, highest first, normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 151 days after the earliest competitor.

The niche, labels, vibe code rating and competitor comparison on this page are analysis by Nicheloom. If you use them, please credit nicheloom.com. How you may use our data.