Nicheloom

Market intelligence for builders — see what's gaining traction before it's crowded.

RoboAPI

A unified REST API for robots, like Stripe but for hardware

Details

External ID
47896975
Source
HN
Company
—
Product
RoboAPI
Website domain
github.com
Launched
April 24, 2026
Cohort
—
Upvotes
11
Upvotes percentile
0.62146529562982
Tags
—
Fetched at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
Updated at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.

Description

Every robot manufacturer ships a different SDK and a different protocol. A Boston Dynamics Spot speaks nothing like a Universal Robots arm. Every team building on top of robots rewrites the same integration layer from scratch. This is a massive tax on the industry.RoboAPI is a unified API layer that abstracts all of that into one clean developer experience. One SDK, one API key, any robot — simulated or real hardware.You can connect a simulated robot and read live telemetry in under 5 minutes: pip install fastapi uvicorn roslibpy uvicorn api.main:app --reload curl -X POST localhost:8000/v1/robots/connect -d '{"robot_id":"bot-01","brand":"simulated"}' curl localhost:8000/v1/robots/bot-01/sense It also connects to real ROS2 robots via rosbridge — I tested it today controlling a turtlesim robot drawing circles through the API.The architecture is pluggable — each robot brand is a separate adapter implementing a common interface (like a payment gateway in Stripe). Adding a new brand means one file.Currently supports: simulated robots and any ROS2 robot. Boston Dynamics and Universal Robots adapters are next.Would love feedback from anyone working in robotics — especially on the API design and what's missing for real-world use.

Enrichment

Theme
Roblox scripting and modding utilities
Vertical
—
Function
Marketplace
Audience
B2B
AI stance
Not AI
Project type
Commercial product
Normalized one-liner
unified api for robot control
Manually corrected
False

Could you build this?

No Building a universal abstraction layer for disparate robotics hardware requires physical access to expensive robots, deep embedded systems engineering, and low-latency real-time control protocols.

What it would actually take: Requires a distributed edge gateway architecture communicating with heterogeneous industrial buses (CAN, EtherCAT, ROS/ROS2, vendor-specific gRPC/TCP protocols) paired with high-level REST/WebSocket cloud endpoints. The difficult engineering lies in deterministic real-time control, safety-critical interlocking, kinematics translation, and physical device driver reverse-engineering. Demands physical robotic hardware labs and specialized mechatronics/robotics firmware engineers.

Discussion

2 comments analyzed.

Competitors mentioned: ROS (Robot Operating System), Transitive Robotics, Boston Dynamics, Universal Robots

Concerns raised: REST is inefficient for robot interactions; pub/sub or blackboard patterns are more natural, Manufacturers resistant to opening robots to standardization, Fragmented adoption of ROS outside academia despite it being the standard

Feature requests: Move commands from REST to pub/sub architecture, Blackboard pattern implementation for fleet layer, MQTT for commands alongside WebSocket telemetry

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one — 53 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #19 of 54 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 161 days after the earliest competitor.

Other launches for this product