Nicheloom

Market intelligence for builders — see what's gaining traction before it's crowded.

Email API benchmarks

Real-world performance data for email providers

Details

External ID
47354963
Source
HN
Company
—
Product
Email API benchmarks
Website domain
knock.app
Launched
March 12, 2026
Cohort
—
Upvotes
8
Upvotes percentile
0.491389913899139
Tags
—
Fetched at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
Updated at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.

Description

Hey HN, I'm Chris, CTO of Knock (https://knock.app). We built email.info because every developer we talk to asks the same question: which email provider should I use?The existing resources are mostly vibes — "Best of" listicles, anonymous Reddit threads, or LLM answers trained on that same content. Objective performance data is always missing.Knock is a notification infrastructure platform, so we send billions of API requests to downstream email providers every year. We aggregated that data into a public dashboard covering 10 providers (SendGrid, Postmark, Resend, Mailgun, Amazon SES, Mandrill, Mailtrap, Mailersend, Sparkpost, and Mailjet) over a trailing 90-day window. What we measure:- Response time — Time to receive a 200 from the provider, computed across p50/p90/p95/p99 using exact quantile calculations in ClickHouse. Includes connection pooling, network latency, and any automatic retries. - Error rate — Ratio of 5xx responses to total requests. Since Knock retries on most 5xx codes, a single request can produce multiple error entries if the backoff sequence runs. - Channel growth — Which providers are gaining or losing adoption on our platform. - Public incidents — We pull each provider's status page via RSS/API and overlay incidents on the performance data, so you can see how well observed degradation correlates with public acknowledgment. - Pricing comparisons — Modeled price curves with head-to-head comparisons at different volume tiers.Some things that surprised us: SendGrid's median response time is 22ms at 500M+ messages, Postmark is 33ms, and there's a meaningful long tail gap between providers at p99. Volume bands indicate our confidence in each provider's data — low-volume providers are flagged accordingly.We're already exploring deliverability and time-to-inbox metrics. Would love feedback from HN on what you'd want to see in a resource like this.

Enrichment

Theme
AI email agents and deliverability
Vertical
Horizontal
Function
Analytics & BI
Audience
Developer
AI stance
Not AI
Project type
Commercial product
Normalized one-liner
email api performance benchmarks
Manually corrected
False

Could you build this?

No The benchmarks rely on proprietary real-time telemetry gathered across billions of production messages sent through Knock's notification infrastructure, which cannot be vibe-coded without access to that massive transactional traffic.

What it would actually take: The product is powered by a high-throughput notifications delivery infrastructure (Elixir/Erlang, Go, Kafka, ClickHouse) routing billions of emails across diverse ESP APIs. It continuously logs latency, HTTP responses, bounce webhooks, and provider uptime, aggregating metrics into analytical time-series storage. Building this requires running a large multi-tenant SaaS business with authentic enterprise traffic to generate statistically significant benchmark data across providers.

Discussion

3 comments analyzed.

Competitors mentioned: Resend, AWS SES

Concerns raised: 2% error rate too high, pricing not competitive with SES

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one — 38 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #19 of 39 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 108 days after the earliest competitor.

Other launches for this product

Same idea, different domain

Nobody's really built a analytics & bi tool for Legal yet.