Nicheloom

Market intelligence for builders — see what's gaining traction before it's crowded.

Running AI agents across environments needs a proper solution

Details

External ID
47501357
Source
HN
Company
—
Product
Running AI agents across environments needs a proper solution
Website domain
github.com
Launched
March 24, 2026
Cohort
—
Upvotes
8
Upvotes percentile
0.491389913899139
Tags
—
Fetched at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
Updated at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.

Description

Hi HN folks,I have been building AI agents for quite some time now. The shift has gone from LLM + Tools → LLM Workflows → Agent + Tools + Memory, and now we are finally seeing true agency emerge: agents as systems composed of tools, command-line access, fine-grained system capabilities, and memory.This way of building agents is powerful, and I believe it is here to stay. But the real question is: are the systems powering these agents ready for that future?I do not think so.Using Docker for a single agent is not going to scale well, because agents need to be lightweight and fast. LLMs already add significant latency, so adding heavy runtime overhead on top only makes things worse. Existing solutions start to fall apart here.Agents built in Python also tend to have a large memory footprint, which becomes a serious problem when you want to scale to thousands of agents.And open-source for agents is still not where it should be. Right now, I cannot easily reuse agents built by domain experts the same way I reuse open-source software.These issues bothered me, and I realized that if agents are ever going to be democratized, they need to be open and easy to use. Just like Docker solved system dependencies, we need something similar for agents.That is why I started building an agent framework in Rust. It is modular and follows the principle of true agency: an agent is an entity with tools, memory, and an executor. In AutoAgents, users can independently create and modify tools, executors, and memory.With AutoAgents, I saw that powerful agents could be built without compromising on performance or memory the way many other frameworks do.But the other problems still remained: re-sharing agents, sandboxing, and scaling to thousands of agents.So I created Odyssey — a bundle-first agent runtime written in Rust on top of AutoAgents, the Rust agent framework. It lets you define an agent once, package it as a portable artifact, and run it through the same execution model across local development, embedded SDK usage, shared runtime servers, and terminal workflows.Both AutoAgents and Odyssey are fully open source and built in Rust, and I am planning to build an Odyssey Agent Hub soon, with additional features like WASM tools, custom memory layers, and more.My vision is to democratize agents so they are available to everyone — securely and performantly. Being open is not enough; agents also need to be secure.The project is still in alpha, but it is in a working state.AutoAgents Repo -> https://github.com/liquidos-ai/AutoAgentsOdyssey Repo -> https://github.com/liquidos-ai/OdysseyI would really appreciate feedback — especially from anyone who has dealt with similar problems. Your feedback help me shape the product.Thanks for your time in advance!

Enrichment

Theme
AI agent frameworks and developer tools
Vertical
—
Function
Model & infra
Audience
Developer
AI stance
AI-native
Project type
Commercial product
Normalized one-liner
ai agent orchestration platform
Manually corrected
False

Could you build this?

Partial Running sandboxed AI agents across varying execution environments with CLI access and state persistence requires secure virtualization or container orchestration infrastructure.

What it would actually take: The architecture demands a secure runtime infrastructure (e.g., Firecracker microVMs, Docker containers, or WebAssembly runtimes) exposed via an orchestration API to provide isolated filesystem and network execution. The system requires state serialization, snapshotting, and secure RPC mechanisms between the host agent and ephemeral sandbox environments. Building robust multi-tenant sandboxing demands low-level systems engineering and container security expertise.

Discussion

5 comments analyzed.

Concerns raised: Potential guideline violations with AI bot usage, Suspicious new account creation for vote manipulation

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one — 1086 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #569 of 1087 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 146 days after the earliest competitor.

Other launches for this product