AI Roundtable
Let 200 models debate your question
Details
- External ID
- 47507666
- Source
- HN
- Company
- —
- Product
- AI Roundtable
- Website domain
- opper.ai
- Launched
- March 24, 2026
- Cohort
- —
- Upvotes
- 118
- Upvotes percentile
- 0.923739237392374
- Tags
- —
- Fetched at
- Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
- Updated at
- Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
Description
Hey HN! After the Car Wash Test post got quite a big discussion going (400+ comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47128138), I spent the past few weeks building a tool so anyone can run these kinds of questions and get structured results. No signup and free to use.You type a question, define answer options, pick up to 50 models at a time from a pool of 200+, and they all answer independently under identical conditions. No system prompt, structured output, same setup for every model.You can also run a debate round where models see each other's reasoning and get a chance to change their minds. A reviewer model then summarizes the full transcript. All models are routed via my startup Opper. Any feedback is welcome!Hope you enjoy it, and would love to hear what you think!
Enrichment
- Theme
- lightweight and on-device AI runtimes
- Vertical
- Horizontal
- Function
- Agent / copilot
- Audience
- B2C
- AI stance
- AI-native
- Project type
- Commercial product
- Normalized one-liner
- debate platform with multiple ai models
- Manually corrected
- False
Could you build this?
Partial The interface and question-orchestration flow are straightforward to vibe-code, but executing queries across 200+ distinct AI models concurrently requires an extensive multi-provider proxy/routing infrastructure and high-throughput rate-limiting management.
What it would actually take: The app requires a Node.js/Python backend coordinating parallel requests through aggregator APIs (like OpenRouter or direct provider keys for Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, AWS Bedrock). The hard part is managing connection timeouts, token costs, rate limits, schema validation, and structured consensus aggregation across hundreds of heterogenous model APIs without failing the user request.
Discussion
20 comments analyzed.
Competitors mentioned: LetsForge.ai - moderated debate format with turn-taking arguments, Roundtable.now - sequential discussions with moderator synthesis, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code Copilot - integrated coding agent workflows
Concerns raised: Models lack access to tools and latest training data, Smaller/older models make consistently wrong choices, LLM-as-a-judge reliability questionable for goal alignment scoring, Roundtables created before account creation can't be modified
Feature requests: MCP integration for use in coding agents and IDEs without leaving workflow, More open-ended question formats, Ability to edit roundtables created before account creation
Competitors
Other products that read as similar to this one — 101 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.
Attention rank: #14 of 102 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).
Launched 140 days after the earliest competitor.
- Roundtable · hn · 2025-12-02 · 6 upvotes · similarity 0.47
- Was tired of drowning in HN comments, so I built an AI Chief of Staff · hn · 2026-01-26 · 5 upvotes · similarity 0.46
- Parley · ph · 2026-09-19 · 1 upvotes · similarity 0.44
- Chatardo · ph · 2026-09-14 · 1 upvotes · similarity 0.43
- Debatly · ph · 2026-09-27 · 2 upvotes · similarity 0.43
- How Stale Is Your AI? Release age and training cutoff for 20 models · hn · 2026-09-16 · 81 upvotes · similarity 0.42
- We polled 2,122 Americans on AI and regulation, and built a visualizer · hn · 2026-06-15 · 5 upvotes · similarity 0.42
- Watch 14-Byte AI "brains" attempt to solve a 2D maze (Its hard) · hn · 2026-07-27 · 25 upvotes · similarity 0.42
Other launches for this product
- No other launches for this product.
Same idea, different domain
Nobody's really built a agent / copilot tool for Agriculture yet.