Nicheloom

Market intelligence for builders — see what's gaining traction before it's crowded.

Total Recall

write-gated memory for Claude Code

Details

External ID
46907183
Source
HN
Company
—
Product
Total Recall
Website domain
github.com
Launched
Feb. 5, 2026
Cohort
—
Upvotes
67
Upvotes percentile
0.8530997304582211
Tags
—
Fetched at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
Updated at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:26 p.m.

Description

built this because I got tired of re-teaching Claude Code the same context every session. Preferences, decisions, “we already tried X,” “don’t touch this file,” etc. After a few days it starts to feel like onboarding the same coworker every morning.Most “agent memory” tools auto-save everything. That feels good briefly, then memory turns into a junk drawer and retrieval gets noisy. Total Recall takes the opposite approach: a write gate. Before anything gets promoted, it asks one question: “Will this change future behavior?” If not, it doesn’t get saved.How it works:Daily log first (raw notes)Promote durable stuff into registers (decisions, preferences, people, projects)Small working memory loads every session (kept intentionally lean)Hooks fail open. SessionStart can surface open loops + recent context. PreCompact writes to disk (not model-visible stdout)The holy shit moment is simple: tell Claude one important preference or decision once, come back tomorrow, and it behaves correctly without you repeating yourself.Would love feedback from heavy Claude Code users:Does the write gate feel right or too strict?Does this actually reduce repetition over multiple days?Any workflow/privacy footguns I’m missing?

Enrichment

Theme
utilities for Claude and Claude Code
Vertical
Horizontal
Function
Dev tools
Audience
Developer
AI stance
AI feature
Project type
Commercial product
Normalized one-liner
memory for claude code
Manually corrected
False

Could you build this?

Yes Total Recall is a developer CLI/hook utility that manages a curated local context file or key-value store to gate persistent agent memory updates.

Discussion

20 comments analyzed.

Competitors mentioned: dory, MemoryLane, Claude Code (native infinite scroll search)

Concerns raised: AI slop in readmes hurting project discoverability, Concurrent sessions writing to same daily log simultaneously, Write gate consistency - model being overly conservative or permissive, Project-scoped memory creates redundancy across multiple projects, Automated memory degrades over time without human curation

Feature requests: Global layer for durable personal context plus project-scoped registers, Proactive surfacing of stale memories ("haven't referenced this in two weeks"), Per-session log files to avoid concurrent write conflicts, Remove-gates with automatic pruning suggestions, In-depth tutorial or comprehensive documentation

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one — 322 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #62 of 323 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 85 days after the earliest competitor.

Other launches for this product

Same idea, different domain

Nobody's really built a dev tools tool for Sales yet.