Nicheloom visits: 58,069 all-time · 7,637 in the last 7 days

The opportunity tracker for new startups.

Today: 1,953 launches · Niche of the day: specialized calculation tools · See what launched today →

Sweep, Open-weights 1.5B model for next-edit autocomplete

Get picks like this daily. Today's launch numbers, the top launches, AI and tech news, and a daily opportunity pick, straight to your inbox.

Want to reach these readers? Sponsor an issue.

Hey HN, we trained and open-sourced a 1.5B model that predicts your next edits, similar to Cursor. You can download the weights here (https://huggingface.co/sweepai/sweep-next-edit-1.5b) or try it in our JetBrains plugin (https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/26860-sweep-ai-autocomp...).Next-edit autocomplete differs from standard autocomplete by using your recent edits as context when predicting completions. The model is small enough to run locally while outperforming models 4x its size on both speed and accuracy.We tested against Mercury (Inception), Zeta (Zed), and Instinct (Continue) across five benchmarks: next-edit above/below cursor, tab-to-jump for distant changes, standard FIM, and noisiness. We found exact-match accuracy correlates best with real usability because code is fairly precise and the solution space is small.Prompt format turned out to matter more than we expected. We ran a genetic algorithm over 30+ diff formats and found simple `original`/`updated` blocks beat unified diffs. The verbose format is just easier for smaller models to understand.Training was SFT on ~100k examples from permissively-licensed repos (4hrs on 8xH100), then RL for 2000 steps with tree-sitter parse checking and size regularization. The RL step fixes edge cases SFT can’t like, generating code that doesn’t parse or overly verbose outputs.We're open-sourcing the weights so the community can build fast, privacy-preserving autocomplete for any editor. If you're building for VSCode, Neovim, or something else, we'd love to see what you make with it!

HN · launched Jan 21, 2026 · 534 upvotes (top 1%) · 0 views

Niche: large language models · 191 launches, 4 in the last 7 days ▼ -33% · Explore this niche →

Category and tags

  • Horizontal
  • Dev tools
  • Developer
  • AI-native
  • Commercial product

Visit website ↗ Source listing ↗

Could you build this?

No Pre-training or fine-tuning a custom 1.5B parameter code LLM for next-edit diff prediction demands substantial GPU compute, specialized dataset curation, and deep ML engineering.

What it would actually take: The project involves building a training pipeline on top of architectures like Qwen-Coder or Llama, curating massive datasets of Git commits and real-time developer keystroke edit histories, and fine-tuning with Fill-In-the-Middle (FIM) objectives. The IDE plugin also requires high-efficiency C++/Rust bindings via llama.cpp or ONNX Runtime to maintain sub-50ms inference latency.

Discussion

20 comments analyzed.

Competitors mentioned: Cursor, Zed, JetBrains Fleet, Codeium

Concerns raised: Undertrained on C#, produces bad code suggestions, Overeager suggestions that don't make sense, Poor quality compared to cloud offerings for some languages, Memory leaks from IDE plugins, Code duplication instead of abstraction in multi-turn sessions

Feature requests: Auto-complete for terminal/CLI commands, VSCode extension support, Self-hosting support via llama.cpp proxy, Vim plugin (not just Neovim), OSS model for email and general text predictions

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one : 57 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #3 of 58 (itself plus its competitors, highest first, normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 77 days after the earliest competitor.

The niche, labels, vibe code rating and competitor comparison on this page are analysis by Nicheloom. If you use them, please credit nicheloom.com. How you may use our data.