The Journal of AI Slop
an AI peer-review journal for AI "research"
Details
- External ID
- 46135038
- Source
- HN
- Company
- —
- Product
- The Journal of AI Slop
- Website domain
- journalofaislop.com
- Launched
- Dec. 3, 2025
- Cohort
- —
- Upvotes
- 5
- Upvotes percentile
- 0.10400763358778627
- Tags
- —
- Fetched at
- Sept. 7, 2026, 9:25 p.m.
- Updated at
- Sept. 7, 2026, 9:25 p.m.
Description
What it is: A fully functional academic journal where every paper must be co-authored by an LLM, and peer review is conducted by a rotating panel of 5 LLMs (Claude, Grok, GPT-4o, Gemini, Llama). If 3+ vote "publish," it's published. If one says "Review could not be parsed into JSON," we celebrate it as a feature.The stack: React + Vite frontend, Convex backend (real-time DB + scheduled functions), Vercel hosting, OpenRouter for multi-model orchestration. Each review costs ~$0.03 and takes 4-8 seconds.Why I built it: Academic publishing is already slop—LLMs write drafts, LLMs review papers, humans hide AI involvement. This holds a mirror to that, but with radical transparency. Every paper displays its carbon cost, review votes, and parse errors as first-class citizens.Key features:- Slop scoring: Papers are evaluated on "academic merit," "unintentional humor," and "Brenda-from-Marketing confusion"- Eco Mode: Toggle between cost/tokens and CO₂/energy use for peer-review inference- SLOPBOT™: Our mascot, a confused robot who occasionally co-authors papers- Parse error celebration: GPT-5-Nano has a 100% rejection rate because it can't output valid JSON. We frame these as "Certified Unparsable" badges.The data: After 76 submissions, we've observed:- Average review cost: $0.03/paper- Parse error rate: 20% (always GPT-5-Nano, expected and celebrated)- One paper was accepted that was literally Archimedes' work rewritten by ChatGPT- GPT-5-Nano's reviews are consistently the most creative (even if broken)Tech details: Full repo at github.com/Popidge/journal_of_ai_slop. The architecture uses Convex's scheduled functions to convene the LLM review panel every 10 minutes, with Azure AI Content Safety for moderation and Resend for optional email notifications.Try it: Submit your slop at journalofaislop.com. Co-author with an LLM, get reviewed by 5 confused AIs, and proudly say you're published.Caveat: This is satire, but it's functional satire. The slop is real. The reviews are real. The carbon emissions are tracked. The parse errors are features.
Enrichment
- Theme
- AI agents for business operations
- Vertical
- Media & entertainment
- Function
- Marketplace
- Audience
- B2C
- AI stance
- Not AI
- Project type
- Hobby / open-source project
- Normalized one-liner
- peer-review journal for ai research
- Manually corrected
- False
Could you build this?
Yes This is a satirical web app combining a submission form, calls to standard commercial LLM APIs with structured JSON output prompts, and a static blog/publishing site.
Discussion
No comments on this launch.
Competitors
Other products that read as similar to this one — 178 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.
Attention rank: #167 of 179 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).
Launched 34 days after the earliest competitor.
- Molt Research · hn · 2026-01-31 · 6 upvotes · similarity 0.61
- slopXiv · ph · 2026-09-17 · 1 upvotes · similarity 0.59
- Slop or not · hn · 2026-03-12 · 19 upvotes · similarity 0.53
- Diffusion PDF · hn · 2026-08-13 · 5 upvotes · similarity 0.53
- research-pass · github · 2026-09-23 · 28 upvotes · similarity 0.49
- Ship or slop · hn · 2026-03-18 · 5 upvotes · similarity 0.47
- Scan any website for AI design patterns · hn · 2026-07-07 · 5 upvotes · similarity 0.46
- slop-grader · ph · 2026-09-21 · 84 upvotes · similarity 0.44
Other launches for this product
- No other launches for this product.
Same idea, different domain
Nobody's really built a marketplace tool for Horizontal yet.