Nicheloom

Market intelligence for builders — see what's gaining traction before it's crowded.

GitForms

Zero-cost contact forms using GitHub Issues as database

Details

External ID
46304199
Source
HN
Company
—
Product
GitForms
Website domain
vercel.app
Launched
Dec. 17, 2025
Cohort
—
Upvotes
40
Upvotes percentile
0.7843511450381679
Tags
—
Fetched at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:25 p.m.
Updated at
Sept. 7, 2026, 9:25 p.m.

Description

got tired of paying $29–99/month for simple contact forms on landing pages and side projects (Typeform, Tally, etc.).So I built GitForms: an open-source contact form that stores submissions as GitHub Issues.How it works:Form runs on your Next.js 14 site (Tailwind + TypeScript) On submit → creates a new Issue in your repo via GitHub API You get instant email notifications from GitHub (free)Zero ongoing costs:No database, no backend servers Deploy on Vercel/Netlify free tier in minutes Configurable via JSON (themes, text, multi-language)Perfect for MVPs, landing pages, portfolios, or any low-volume use case.Repo: https://github.com/Luigigreco/gitforms License: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0 (non-commercial only – fine for personal projects, not client work).Curious what HN thinks: would you use this? Any obvious improvements or edge cases I missed?Thanks!

Enrichment

Theme
git and repository workflow tools
Vertical
Horizontal
Function
Vertical SaaS
Audience
Developer
AI stance
Not AI
Project type
Commercial product
Normalized one-liner
contact forms backed by github issues
Manually corrected
False

Could you build this?

Yes The system simply accepts form submissions on a Next.js frontend and creates corresponding GitHub Issues via the GitHub REST API, maximizing developer utility with standard web APIs.

Discussion

20 comments analyzed.

Competitors mentioned: Google Forms with Google Sheets integration, Giscus (GitHub issues for comments), Utterances (GitHub issues hosting), Custom GitLab-based form solutions

Concerns raised: GitHub token exposure in frontend, GitHub may discontinue due to self-hosted runner fees, High spam without protection, Low barrier to entry makes business viability questionable, Trademark concerns with 'Git' prefix naming

Feature requests: Email backend flexibility (Resend, Mailgun instead of GitHub-only), Alternative spam protection providers (Cloudflare, Google), Support for private GitLab instead of public GitHub, Better naming option (e.g., 'FormGit')

Competitors

Other products that read as similar to this one — 88 launches clear the similarity bar, closest 8 shown.

Attention rank: #17 of 89 (itself plus its competitors, highest first — normalized so YC and Product Hunt are compared fairly).

Launched 47 days after the earliest competitor.

Other launches for this product

Same idea, different domain

Nobody's really built a vertical saas tool for Insurance yet.